The man accused of attempting to assassinate President Donald Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner (WHCD) was in court Monday, where a federal magistrate judge apologized for his treatment behind bars.
As reported on Tuesday’s AM Update, suspect Cole Thomas Allen appeared before Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui for a hearing on conditions at the Correctional Treatment Facility at the Washington, D.C., jail complex where he is being held ahead of trial.
The Magistrate
Magistrate judges are not appointed by presidents, instead reaching the bench by a majority vote of the active district court judges. Faruqui has been in his current role since 2020 after serving as a federal prosecutor for 12 years.
Judge Faruqui has previously issued rulings critical of the Trump administration, repeatedly challenging from the bench aggressive federal enforcement tactics during the fed’s D.C. crime crackdown.
Journalist Julie Kelly reported in September 2025 on Faruqui’s outrage after a D.C. grand jury refused to indict Edward Dana, career criminal with nine prior convictions and 23 arrests who, upon arrest for vandalism, allegedly committed the crime of saying he wanted to kill the president – a crime the grand jury rejected and which prosecutors were then forced to drop.
Was Faruqui angry that a danger to the president was getting away? Hardly. Instead, he blamed the decision on the public’s fear of the Trump administration’s crime fighting efforts, lamenting:
“How do we reestablish faith in people in DC that they’re not going to be wrongly arrested, when the hobby, or whatever, the interest of the moment, if we move to Chicago or whatever city, Baltimore, or whatever next thing it is that catches the administration’s interest, what are we, the people left here in Washington, DC, who have actually lived here, had to suffer through whatever is happening, how am I supposed to reestablish confidence in every defense lawyer and defendant that they are being treated fairly and rightly?”
The Hearing
Allen’s experience in prison since his arrest at the WHCD late last month was at the center of Monday’s hearing. The 31 year old was initially placed on suicide watch, held in a solitary, padded cell that remained constantly lit, and denied access to phone calls, books, religious material, and recreational time.
His attorneys had requested Monday’s hearing to challenge those conditions, arguing the placement on suicide watch was unwarranted. After Allen was removed from suicide watch, his legal team moved to cancel the proceeding altogether, but the judge denied that request, citing what he called “grave concerns” about the justification for Allen’s confinement and the conditions he had been subjected to.
Allen is currently in restrictive housing, which Reuters reported is a placement his lawyers do not oppose. Last week, his team agreed he should remain in custody and opted not to challenge prosecutors’ assertion that he poses a danger to the public.
A jail official said yesterday that Allen was placed on suicide watch for a short period following an initial medical evaluation, adding that a final determination on his housing assignment is still pending. Prosecutors noted that Allen told FBI agents the night of the alleged attack he did not expect to survive, a statement jail officials may have used to justify placing him on suicide watch. Magistrate Faruqui pushed back, asserting Allen could have meant he expected to be shot, rather than indicating any intent to take his own life.
During the hearing, the judge addressed Allen directly. “I am very troubled by what they indicate the conditions that you have been subjected to,” he said. “I’m sorry, it sounds like things have not been the way they’re supposed to.”
The judge emphasized that Allen is still presumed innocent and had no prior criminal history. He compared the suspect’s treatment to that of defendants charged in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. Many of those defendants complained of overly restrictive lockdowns, limited access to attorneys, and challenges reviewing evidence. But the judge indicating Allen’s treatment appeared even more severe.
Faruqui ordered corrections officials to provide Allen with a Bible, as he had requested, and provide the court with an update by Tuesday morning on whether Allen will be placed in a less restrictive unit.
Additional Charges
U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro reacted to Monday’s hearing on X. “Welcome to Washington, DC, where U.S. Magistrate Judge Faruqui believes a defendant armed to the teeth and attempting to assassinate the president is entitled to preferential treatment in his confinement compared to every other defendant,” she wrote.
Allen is facing charges of attempted assassination of a U.S. president and firearms violations after he was captured on security camera charging a security checkpoint at White House Correspondents Dinner, and Pirro indicated more charges may be coming. Her team will be appearing in front of a D.C. grand jury later this week with more video evidence against the defendant.
On CNN Sunday, she said prosecutors have a strong case against Allen. “Its a pretty solid case… I think if you read that manifesto… It is very clear who the intended target is,” she explained. “As soon as the president made clear he was going to be at the dinner on March 2, he then hatched the plan. We have a lot of information that indicates his intent… tracking on his phone is the president there yet has the president sat down yet, what time will dinner be served.”
Allen has not yet entered a plea. His next preliminary hearing set for Monday.
You can get all the day’s headlines by tuning into the AM Update with Megyn Kelly on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you like to listen. And don’t forget that you can catch AM Update on SiriusXM’s The Megyn Kelly Channel (channel 111).